<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Falling Out Of Bed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 23:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christian H</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21278</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 06:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21278</guid>
		<description>I just wanted to say that this is an amazing blog. It's introducing me to new types of music and I didn't think so much about how people analyze songs either!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to say that this is an amazing blog. It&#8217;s introducing me to new types of music and I didn&#8217;t think so much about how people analyze songs either!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Perpetua</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21271</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 06:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21271</guid>
		<description>But "Go to Sleep" was a single!  And the final four songs are the very best!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But &#8220;Go to Sleep&#8221; was a single!  And the final four songs are the very best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob K</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21270</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21270</guid>
		<description>Oh, listen to it on vinyl?  Interesting!  I've never approached it from that perspective and I can see your point.

I think I'd cut some songs near the end that are just out of place enough that the record starts sounding like a long odds-and-sods comp: "I Will,""Punch Up", "Wolf at the Door." And I love those songs, the last two being personal favorites, but they could be B-sides (or in the case of "Punch Up", a nice fit on "In Rainbows").  After that I'd maybe delegate "Go To Sleep" to B-side status as well, to get it all down to a more focused and cohesive 42 minutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, listen to it on vinyl?  Interesting!  I&#8217;ve never approached it from that perspective and I can see your point.</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;d cut some songs near the end that are just out of place enough that the record starts sounding like a long odds-and-sods comp: &#8220;I Will,&#8221;"Punch Up&#8221;, &#8220;Wolf at the Door.&#8221; And I love those songs, the last two being personal favorites, but they could be B-sides (or in the case of &#8220;Punch Up&#8221;, a nice fit on &#8220;In Rainbows&#8221;).  After that I&#8217;d maybe delegate &#8220;Go To Sleep&#8221; to B-side status as well, to get it all down to a more focused and cohesive 42 minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Perpetua</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21269</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21269</guid>
		<description>Ahhh, but what would you cut? I think Hail is a pretty strong album and works very well as an album split over four sides. The only song I can imagine cutting is "I Will."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhh, but what would you cut? I think Hail is a pretty strong album and works very well as an album split over four sides. The only song I can imagine cutting is &#8220;I Will.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob K</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21268</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 14:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21268</guid>
		<description>For the most part I am in favor of albums that come in around 38-45 minutes.  

If Radiohead had cut some chaff from "Hail to the Thief" and got it down to under 40 minutes, it might be considered their best album (or at least on par with their best work).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the most part I am in favor of albums that come in around 38-45 minutes.  </p>
<p>If Radiohead had cut some chaff from &#8220;Hail to the Thief&#8221; and got it down to under 40 minutes, it might be considered their best album (or at least on par with their best work).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I wrote about Radiohead a while ago but was too busy to put it up, so here it is now. &#171; Attentiondeficitdisorderly by Sean T. Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21264</link>
		<dc:creator>I wrote about Radiohead a while ago but was too busy to put it up, so here it is now. &#171; Attentiondeficitdisorderly by Sean T. Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 02:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21264</guid>
		<description>[...] of Limbs, the other day. I don&#8217;t think I see much value in viewing it through the lens of &#8220;Radiohead&#8217;s weakest album&#8221; as does my friend Matthew Perpetua. I get what he&#8217;s saying about it being a relatively minor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Limbs, the other day. I don&#8217;t think I see much value in viewing it through the lens of &#8220;Radiohead&#8217;s weakest album&#8221; as does my friend Matthew Perpetua. I get what he&#8217;s saying about it being a relatively minor [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Perpetua</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21239</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 04:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21239</guid>
		<description>How is this album "incomplete?" Seriously, even if Radiohead puts out another new album next Friday, this is still an album in its own right! They have said and done nothing to the contrary. Why is it so hard for Radiohead fans to grasp the notion that many albums are under 40 minutes, and that many albums have 8 songs or fewer? I mean, are you trying to say that Led Zepellin IV isn't an album because it has 8 songs and came out under a year after Led Zeppelin III?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is this album &#8220;incomplete?&#8221; Seriously, even if Radiohead puts out another new album next Friday, this is still an album in its own right! They have said and done nothing to the contrary. Why is it so hard for Radiohead fans to grasp the notion that many albums are under 40 minutes, and that many albums have 8 songs or fewer? I mean, are you trying to say that Led Zepellin IV isn&#8217;t an album because it has 8 songs and came out under a year after Led Zeppelin III?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21238</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 03:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21238</guid>
		<description>My jaw dropped when I read that second line. I believe that the second half of TKOL is simply amazing, and the album is far superior to both Pablo Honey (although yes, Creep is amazing) and Hail to the Theif. 

This album has been reviewed (often negatively) by Radiohead's high standards, and although this is unavoidable TKOL needs to be considered both as a Radiohead album AND as a regular 2011 album. They shouldn't be criticised for failing to produce another album of Kid A's calibre when no other band around could anyway.

Although I thoroughly enjoyed this album, I wonder just how much longer Radiohead should (or even could) keep producing albums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My jaw dropped when I read that second line. I believe that the second half of TKOL is simply amazing, and the album is far superior to both Pablo Honey (although yes, Creep is amazing) and Hail to the Theif. </p>
<p>This album has been reviewed (often negatively) by Radiohead&#8217;s high standards, and although this is unavoidable TKOL needs to be considered both as a Radiohead album AND as a regular 2011 album. They shouldn&#8217;t be criticised for failing to produce another album of Kid A&#8217;s calibre when no other band around could anyway.</p>
<p>Although I thoroughly enjoyed this album, I wonder just how much longer Radiohead should (or even could) keep producing albums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fake Plastic Tunes</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21236</link>
		<dc:creator>Fake Plastic Tunes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21236</guid>
		<description>Hard to call this the weakest album when it is still incomplete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard to call this the weakest album when it is still incomplete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Revolution Is On YouTube - Push Play - push.ca</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 23:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comments on: Falling Out Of Bed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 23:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christian H</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21278</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 06:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21278</guid>
		<description>I just wanted to say that this is an amazing blog. It's introducing me to new types of music and I didn't think so much about how people analyze songs either!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to say that this is an amazing blog. It&#8217;s introducing me to new types of music and I didn&#8217;t think so much about how people analyze songs either!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Perpetua</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21271</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 06:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21271</guid>
		<description>But "Go to Sleep" was a single!  And the final four songs are the very best!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But &#8220;Go to Sleep&#8221; was a single!  And the final four songs are the very best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob K</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21270</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21270</guid>
		<description>Oh, listen to it on vinyl?  Interesting!  I've never approached it from that perspective and I can see your point.

I think I'd cut some songs near the end that are just out of place enough that the record starts sounding like a long odds-and-sods comp: "I Will,""Punch Up", "Wolf at the Door." And I love those songs, the last two being personal favorites, but they could be B-sides (or in the case of "Punch Up", a nice fit on "In Rainbows").  After that I'd maybe delegate "Go To Sleep" to B-side status as well, to get it all down to a more focused and cohesive 42 minutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, listen to it on vinyl?  Interesting!  I&#8217;ve never approached it from that perspective and I can see your point.</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;d cut some songs near the end that are just out of place enough that the record starts sounding like a long odds-and-sods comp: &#8220;I Will,&#8221;"Punch Up&#8221;, &#8220;Wolf at the Door.&#8221; And I love those songs, the last two being personal favorites, but they could be B-sides (or in the case of &#8220;Punch Up&#8221;, a nice fit on &#8220;In Rainbows&#8221;).  After that I&#8217;d maybe delegate &#8220;Go To Sleep&#8221; to B-side status as well, to get it all down to a more focused and cohesive 42 minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Perpetua</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21269</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21269</guid>
		<description>Ahhh, but what would you cut? I think Hail is a pretty strong album and works very well as an album split over four sides. The only song I can imagine cutting is "I Will."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhh, but what would you cut? I think Hail is a pretty strong album and works very well as an album split over four sides. The only song I can imagine cutting is &#8220;I Will.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob K</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21268</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 14:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21268</guid>
		<description>For the most part I am in favor of albums that come in around 38-45 minutes.  

If Radiohead had cut some chaff from "Hail to the Thief" and got it down to under 40 minutes, it might be considered their best album (or at least on par with their best work).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the most part I am in favor of albums that come in around 38-45 minutes.  </p>
<p>If Radiohead had cut some chaff from &#8220;Hail to the Thief&#8221; and got it down to under 40 minutes, it might be considered their best album (or at least on par with their best work).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I wrote about Radiohead a while ago but was too busy to put it up, so here it is now. &#171; Attentiondeficitdisorderly by Sean T. Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21264</link>
		<dc:creator>I wrote about Radiohead a while ago but was too busy to put it up, so here it is now. &#171; Attentiondeficitdisorderly by Sean T. Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 02:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21264</guid>
		<description>[...] of Limbs, the other day. I don&#8217;t think I see much value in viewing it through the lens of &#8220;Radiohead&#8217;s weakest album&#8221; as does my friend Matthew Perpetua. I get what he&#8217;s saying about it being a relatively minor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Limbs, the other day. I don&#8217;t think I see much value in viewing it through the lens of &#8220;Radiohead&#8217;s weakest album&#8221; as does my friend Matthew Perpetua. I get what he&#8217;s saying about it being a relatively minor [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Perpetua</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21239</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 04:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21239</guid>
		<description>How is this album "incomplete?" Seriously, even if Radiohead puts out another new album next Friday, this is still an album in its own right! They have said and done nothing to the contrary. Why is it so hard for Radiohead fans to grasp the notion that many albums are under 40 minutes, and that many albums have 8 songs or fewer? I mean, are you trying to say that Led Zepellin IV isn't an album because it has 8 songs and came out under a year after Led Zeppelin III?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is this album &#8220;incomplete?&#8221; Seriously, even if Radiohead puts out another new album next Friday, this is still an album in its own right! They have said and done nothing to the contrary. Why is it so hard for Radiohead fans to grasp the notion that many albums are under 40 minutes, and that many albums have 8 songs or fewer? I mean, are you trying to say that Led Zepellin IV isn&#8217;t an album because it has 8 songs and came out under a year after Led Zeppelin III?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21238</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 03:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21238</guid>
		<description>My jaw dropped when I read that second line. I believe that the second half of TKOL is simply amazing, and the album is far superior to both Pablo Honey (although yes, Creep is amazing) and Hail to the Theif. 

This album has been reviewed (often negatively) by Radiohead's high standards, and although this is unavoidable TKOL needs to be considered both as a Radiohead album AND as a regular 2011 album. They shouldn't be criticised for failing to produce another album of Kid A's calibre when no other band around could anyway.

Although I thoroughly enjoyed this album, I wonder just how much longer Radiohead should (or even could) keep producing albums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My jaw dropped when I read that second line. I believe that the second half of TKOL is simply amazing, and the album is far superior to both Pablo Honey (although yes, Creep is amazing) and Hail to the Theif. </p>
<p>This album has been reviewed (often negatively) by Radiohead&#8217;s high standards, and although this is unavoidable TKOL needs to be considered both as a Radiohead album AND as a regular 2011 album. They shouldn&#8217;t be criticised for failing to produce another album of Kid A&#8217;s calibre when no other band around could anyway.</p>
<p>Although I thoroughly enjoyed this album, I wonder just how much longer Radiohead should (or even could) keep producing albums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fake Plastic Tunes</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21236</link>
		<dc:creator>Fake Plastic Tunes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21236</guid>
		<description>Hard to call this the weakest album when it is still incomplete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard to call this the weakest album when it is still incomplete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Revolution Is On YouTube - Push Play - push.ca</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21278</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 06:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21278</guid>
		<description>I just wanted to say that this is an amazing blog. It's introducing me to new types of music and I didn't think so much about how people analyze songs either!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to say that this is an amazing blog. It&#8217;s introducing me to new types of music and I didn&#8217;t think so much about how people analyze songs either!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Falling Out Of Bed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 23:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christian H</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21278</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 06:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21278</guid>
		<description>I just wanted to say that this is an amazing blog. It's introducing me to new types of music and I didn't think so much about how people analyze songs either!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to say that this is an amazing blog. It&#8217;s introducing me to new types of music and I didn&#8217;t think so much about how people analyze songs either!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Perpetua</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21271</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 06:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21271</guid>
		<description>But "Go to Sleep" was a single!  And the final four songs are the very best!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But &#8220;Go to Sleep&#8221; was a single!  And the final four songs are the very best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob K</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21270</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21270</guid>
		<description>Oh, listen to it on vinyl?  Interesting!  I've never approached it from that perspective and I can see your point.

I think I'd cut some songs near the end that are just out of place enough that the record starts sounding like a long odds-and-sods comp: "I Will,""Punch Up", "Wolf at the Door." And I love those songs, the last two being personal favorites, but they could be B-sides (or in the case of "Punch Up", a nice fit on "In Rainbows").  After that I'd maybe delegate "Go To Sleep" to B-side status as well, to get it all down to a more focused and cohesive 42 minutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, listen to it on vinyl?  Interesting!  I&#8217;ve never approached it from that perspective and I can see your point.</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;d cut some songs near the end that are just out of place enough that the record starts sounding like a long odds-and-sods comp: &#8220;I Will,&#8221;"Punch Up&#8221;, &#8220;Wolf at the Door.&#8221; And I love those songs, the last two being personal favorites, but they could be B-sides (or in the case of &#8220;Punch Up&#8221;, a nice fit on &#8220;In Rainbows&#8221;).  After that I&#8217;d maybe delegate &#8220;Go To Sleep&#8221; to B-side status as well, to get it all down to a more focused and cohesive 42 minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Perpetua</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21269</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21269</guid>
		<description>Ahhh, but what would you cut? I think Hail is a pretty strong album and works very well as an album split over four sides. The only song I can imagine cutting is "I Will."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhh, but what would you cut? I think Hail is a pretty strong album and works very well as an album split over four sides. The only song I can imagine cutting is &#8220;I Will.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob K</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21268</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 14:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21268</guid>
		<description>For the most part I am in favor of albums that come in around 38-45 minutes.  

If Radiohead had cut some chaff from "Hail to the Thief" and got it down to under 40 minutes, it might be considered their best album (or at least on par with their best work).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the most part I am in favor of albums that come in around 38-45 minutes.  </p>
<p>If Radiohead had cut some chaff from &#8220;Hail to the Thief&#8221; and got it down to under 40 minutes, it might be considered their best album (or at least on par with their best work).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I wrote about Radiohead a while ago but was too busy to put it up, so here it is now. &#171; Attentiondeficitdisorderly by Sean T. Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21264</link>
		<dc:creator>I wrote about Radiohead a while ago but was too busy to put it up, so here it is now. &#171; Attentiondeficitdisorderly by Sean T. Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 02:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21264</guid>
		<description>[...] of Limbs, the other day. I don&#8217;t think I see much value in viewing it through the lens of &#8220;Radiohead&#8217;s weakest album&#8221; as does my friend Matthew Perpetua. I get what he&#8217;s saying about it being a relatively minor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Limbs, the other day. I don&#8217;t think I see much value in viewing it through the lens of &#8220;Radiohead&#8217;s weakest album&#8221; as does my friend Matthew Perpetua. I get what he&#8217;s saying about it being a relatively minor [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Perpetua</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21239</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 04:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21239</guid>
		<description>How is this album "incomplete?" Seriously, even if Radiohead puts out another new album next Friday, this is still an album in its own right! They have said and done nothing to the contrary. Why is it so hard for Radiohead fans to grasp the notion that many albums are under 40 minutes, and that many albums have 8 songs or fewer? I mean, are you trying to say that Led Zepellin IV isn't an album because it has 8 songs and came out under a year after Led Zeppelin III?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is this album &#8220;incomplete?&#8221; Seriously, even if Radiohead puts out another new album next Friday, this is still an album in its own right! They have said and done nothing to the contrary. Why is it so hard for Radiohead fans to grasp the notion that many albums are under 40 minutes, and that many albums have 8 songs or fewer? I mean, are you trying to say that Led Zepellin IV isn&#8217;t an album because it has 8 songs and came out under a year after Led Zeppelin III?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21238</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 03:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21238</guid>
		<description>My jaw dropped when I read that second line. I believe that the second half of TKOL is simply amazing, and the album is far superior to both Pablo Honey (although yes, Creep is amazing) and Hail to the Theif. 

This album has been reviewed (often negatively) by Radiohead's high standards, and although this is unavoidable TKOL needs to be considered both as a Radiohead album AND as a regular 2011 album. They shouldn't be criticised for failing to produce another album of Kid A's calibre when no other band around could anyway.

Although I thoroughly enjoyed this album, I wonder just how much longer Radiohead should (or even could) keep producing albums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My jaw dropped when I read that second line. I believe that the second half of TKOL is simply amazing, and the album is far superior to both Pablo Honey (although yes, Creep is amazing) and Hail to the Theif. </p>
<p>This album has been reviewed (often negatively) by Radiohead&#8217;s high standards, and although this is unavoidable TKOL needs to be considered both as a Radiohead album AND as a regular 2011 album. They shouldn&#8217;t be criticised for failing to produce another album of Kid A&#8217;s calibre when no other band around could anyway.</p>
<p>Although I thoroughly enjoyed this album, I wonder just how much longer Radiohead should (or even could) keep producing albums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fake Plastic Tunes</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21236</link>
		<dc:creator>Fake Plastic Tunes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21236</guid>
		<description>Hard to call this the weakest album when it is still incomplete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard to call this the weakest album when it is still incomplete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Revolution Is On YouTube - Push Play - push.ca</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21271</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 06:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21271</guid>
		<description>But "Go to Sleep" was a single!  And the final four songs are the very best!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But &#8220;Go to Sleep&#8221; was a single!  And the final four songs are the very best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Falling Out Of Bed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 23:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christian H</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21278</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 06:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21278</guid>
		<description>I just wanted to say that this is an amazing blog. It's introducing me to new types of music and I didn't think so much about how people analyze songs either!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to say that this is an amazing blog. It&#8217;s introducing me to new types of music and I didn&#8217;t think so much about how people analyze songs either!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Perpetua</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21271</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 06:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21271</guid>
		<description>But "Go to Sleep" was a single!  And the final four songs are the very best!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But &#8220;Go to Sleep&#8221; was a single!  And the final four songs are the very best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob K</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21270</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21270</guid>
		<description>Oh, listen to it on vinyl?  Interesting!  I've never approached it from that perspective and I can see your point.

I think I'd cut some songs near the end that are just out of place enough that the record starts sounding like a long odds-and-sods comp: "I Will,""Punch Up", "Wolf at the Door." And I love those songs, the last two being personal favorites, but they could be B-sides (or in the case of "Punch Up", a nice fit on "In Rainbows").  After that I'd maybe delegate "Go To Sleep" to B-side status as well, to get it all down to a more focused and cohesive 42 minutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, listen to it on vinyl?  Interesting!  I&#8217;ve never approached it from that perspective and I can see your point.</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;d cut some songs near the end that are just out of place enough that the record starts sounding like a long odds-and-sods comp: &#8220;I Will,&#8221;"Punch Up&#8221;, &#8220;Wolf at the Door.&#8221; And I love those songs, the last two being personal favorites, but they could be B-sides (or in the case of &#8220;Punch Up&#8221;, a nice fit on &#8220;In Rainbows&#8221;).  After that I&#8217;d maybe delegate &#8220;Go To Sleep&#8221; to B-side status as well, to get it all down to a more focused and cohesive 42 minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Perpetua</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21269</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21269</guid>
		<description>Ahhh, but what would you cut? I think Hail is a pretty strong album and works very well as an album split over four sides. The only song I can imagine cutting is "I Will."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhh, but what would you cut? I think Hail is a pretty strong album and works very well as an album split over four sides. The only song I can imagine cutting is &#8220;I Will.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob K</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21268</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 14:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21268</guid>
		<description>For the most part I am in favor of albums that come in around 38-45 minutes.  

If Radiohead had cut some chaff from "Hail to the Thief" and got it down to under 40 minutes, it might be considered their best album (or at least on par with their best work).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the most part I am in favor of albums that come in around 38-45 minutes.  </p>
<p>If Radiohead had cut some chaff from &#8220;Hail to the Thief&#8221; and got it down to under 40 minutes, it might be considered their best album (or at least on par with their best work).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I wrote about Radiohead a while ago but was too busy to put it up, so here it is now. &#171; Attentiondeficitdisorderly by Sean T. Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21264</link>
		<dc:creator>I wrote about Radiohead a while ago but was too busy to put it up, so here it is now. &#171; Attentiondeficitdisorderly by Sean T. Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 02:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21264</guid>
		<description>[...] of Limbs, the other day. I don&#8217;t think I see much value in viewing it through the lens of &#8220;Radiohead&#8217;s weakest album&#8221; as does my friend Matthew Perpetua. I get what he&#8217;s saying about it being a relatively minor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Limbs, the other day. I don&#8217;t think I see much value in viewing it through the lens of &#8220;Radiohead&#8217;s weakest album&#8221; as does my friend Matthew Perpetua. I get what he&#8217;s saying about it being a relatively minor [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Perpetua</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21239</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 04:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21239</guid>
		<description>How is this album "incomplete?" Seriously, even if Radiohead puts out another new album next Friday, this is still an album in its own right! They have said and done nothing to the contrary. Why is it so hard for Radiohead fans to grasp the notion that many albums are under 40 minutes, and that many albums have 8 songs or fewer? I mean, are you trying to say that Led Zepellin IV isn't an album because it has 8 songs and came out under a year after Led Zeppelin III?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is this album &#8220;incomplete?&#8221; Seriously, even if Radiohead puts out another new album next Friday, this is still an album in its own right! They have said and done nothing to the contrary. Why is it so hard for Radiohead fans to grasp the notion that many albums are under 40 minutes, and that many albums have 8 songs or fewer? I mean, are you trying to say that Led Zepellin IV isn&#8217;t an album because it has 8 songs and came out under a year after Led Zeppelin III?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21238</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 03:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21238</guid>
		<description>My jaw dropped when I read that second line. I believe that the second half of TKOL is simply amazing, and the album is far superior to both Pablo Honey (although yes, Creep is amazing) and Hail to the Theif. 

This album has been reviewed (often negatively) by Radiohead's high standards, and although this is unavoidable TKOL needs to be considered both as a Radiohead album AND as a regular 2011 album. They shouldn't be criticised for failing to produce another album of Kid A's calibre when no other band around could anyway.

Although I thoroughly enjoyed this album, I wonder just how much longer Radiohead should (or even could) keep producing albums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My jaw dropped when I read that second line. I believe that the second half of TKOL is simply amazing, and the album is far superior to both Pablo Honey (although yes, Creep is amazing) and Hail to the Theif. </p>
<p>This album has been reviewed (often negatively) by Radiohead&#8217;s high standards, and although this is unavoidable TKOL needs to be considered both as a Radiohead album AND as a regular 2011 album. They shouldn&#8217;t be criticised for failing to produce another album of Kid A&#8217;s calibre when no other band around could anyway.</p>
<p>Although I thoroughly enjoyed this album, I wonder just how much longer Radiohead should (or even could) keep producing albums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fake Plastic Tunes</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21236</link>
		<dc:creator>Fake Plastic Tunes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21236</guid>
		<description>Hard to call this the weakest album when it is still incomplete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard to call this the weakest album when it is still incomplete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Revolution Is On YouTube - Push Play - push.ca</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21270</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21270</guid>
		<description>Oh, listen to it on vinyl?  Interesting!  I've never approached it from that perspective and I can see your point.

I think I'd cut some songs near the end that are just out of place enough that the record starts sounding like a long odds-and-sods comp: "I Will,""Punch Up", "Wolf at the Door." And I love those songs, the last two being personal favorites, but they could be B-sides (or in the case of "Punch Up", a nice fit on "In Rainbows").  After that I'd maybe delegate "Go To Sleep" to B-side status as well, to get it all down to a more focused and cohesive 42 minutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, listen to it on vinyl?  Interesting!  I&#8217;ve never approached it from that perspective and I can see your point.</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;d cut some songs near the end that are just out of place enough that the record starts sounding like a long odds-and-sods comp: &#8220;I Will,&#8221;"Punch Up&#8221;, &#8220;Wolf at the Door.&#8221; And I love those songs, the last two being personal favorites, but they could be B-sides (or in the case of &#8220;Punch Up&#8221;, a nice fit on &#8220;In Rainbows&#8221;).  After that I&#8217;d maybe delegate &#8220;Go To Sleep&#8221; to B-side status as well, to get it all down to a more focused and cohesive 42 minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Falling Out Of Bed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 23:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christian H</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21278</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 06:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21278</guid>
		<description>I just wanted to say that this is an amazing blog. It's introducing me to new types of music and I didn't think so much about how people analyze songs either!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to say that this is an amazing blog. It&#8217;s introducing me to new types of music and I didn&#8217;t think so much about how people analyze songs either!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Perpetua</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21271</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 06:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21271</guid>
		<description>But "Go to Sleep" was a single!  And the final four songs are the very best!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But &#8220;Go to Sleep&#8221; was a single!  And the final four songs are the very best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob K</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21270</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21270</guid>
		<description>Oh, listen to it on vinyl?  Interesting!  I've never approached it from that perspective and I can see your point.

I think I'd cut some songs near the end that are just out of place enough that the record starts sounding like a long odds-and-sods comp: "I Will,""Punch Up", "Wolf at the Door." And I love those songs, the last two being personal favorites, but they could be B-sides (or in the case of "Punch Up", a nice fit on "In Rainbows").  After that I'd maybe delegate "Go To Sleep" to B-side status as well, to get it all down to a more focused and cohesive 42 minutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, listen to it on vinyl?  Interesting!  I&#8217;ve never approached it from that perspective and I can see your point.</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;d cut some songs near the end that are just out of place enough that the record starts sounding like a long odds-and-sods comp: &#8220;I Will,&#8221;"Punch Up&#8221;, &#8220;Wolf at the Door.&#8221; And I love those songs, the last two being personal favorites, but they could be B-sides (or in the case of &#8220;Punch Up&#8221;, a nice fit on &#8220;In Rainbows&#8221;).  After that I&#8217;d maybe delegate &#8220;Go To Sleep&#8221; to B-side status as well, to get it all down to a more focused and cohesive 42 minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Perpetua</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21269</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21269</guid>
		<description>Ahhh, but what would you cut? I think Hail is a pretty strong album and works very well as an album split over four sides. The only song I can imagine cutting is "I Will."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhh, but what would you cut? I think Hail is a pretty strong album and works very well as an album split over four sides. The only song I can imagine cutting is &#8220;I Will.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob K</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21268</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 14:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21268</guid>
		<description>For the most part I am in favor of albums that come in around 38-45 minutes.  

If Radiohead had cut some chaff from "Hail to the Thief" and got it down to under 40 minutes, it might be considered their best album (or at least on par with their best work).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the most part I am in favor of albums that come in around 38-45 minutes.  </p>
<p>If Radiohead had cut some chaff from &#8220;Hail to the Thief&#8221; and got it down to under 40 minutes, it might be considered their best album (or at least on par with their best work).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I wrote about Radiohead a while ago but was too busy to put it up, so here it is now. &#171; Attentiondeficitdisorderly by Sean T. Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21264</link>
		<dc:creator>I wrote about Radiohead a while ago but was too busy to put it up, so here it is now. &#171; Attentiondeficitdisorderly by Sean T. Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 02:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21264</guid>
		<description>[...] of Limbs, the other day. I don&#8217;t think I see much value in viewing it through the lens of &#8220;Radiohead&#8217;s weakest album&#8221; as does my friend Matthew Perpetua. I get what he&#8217;s saying about it being a relatively minor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Limbs, the other day. I don&#8217;t think I see much value in viewing it through the lens of &#8220;Radiohead&#8217;s weakest album&#8221; as does my friend Matthew Perpetua. I get what he&#8217;s saying about it being a relatively minor [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Perpetua</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21239</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 04:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21239</guid>
		<description>How is this album "incomplete?" Seriously, even if Radiohead puts out another new album next Friday, this is still an album in its own right! They have said and done nothing to the contrary. Why is it so hard for Radiohead fans to grasp the notion that many albums are under 40 minutes, and that many albums have 8 songs or fewer? I mean, are you trying to say that Led Zepellin IV isn't an album because it has 8 songs and came out under a year after Led Zeppelin III?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is this album &#8220;incomplete?&#8221; Seriously, even if Radiohead puts out another new album next Friday, this is still an album in its own right! They have said and done nothing to the contrary. Why is it so hard for Radiohead fans to grasp the notion that many albums are under 40 minutes, and that many albums have 8 songs or fewer? I mean, are you trying to say that Led Zepellin IV isn&#8217;t an album because it has 8 songs and came out under a year after Led Zeppelin III?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21238</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 03:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21238</guid>
		<description>My jaw dropped when I read that second line. I believe that the second half of TKOL is simply amazing, and the album is far superior to both Pablo Honey (although yes, Creep is amazing) and Hail to the Theif. 

This album has been reviewed (often negatively) by Radiohead's high standards, and although this is unavoidable TKOL needs to be considered both as a Radiohead album AND as a regular 2011 album. They shouldn't be criticised for failing to produce another album of Kid A's calibre when no other band around could anyway.

Although I thoroughly enjoyed this album, I wonder just how much longer Radiohead should (or even could) keep producing albums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My jaw dropped when I read that second line. I believe that the second half of TKOL is simply amazing, and the album is far superior to both Pablo Honey (although yes, Creep is amazing) and Hail to the Theif. </p>
<p>This album has been reviewed (often negatively) by Radiohead&#8217;s high standards, and although this is unavoidable TKOL needs to be considered both as a Radiohead album AND as a regular 2011 album. They shouldn&#8217;t be criticised for failing to produce another album of Kid A&#8217;s calibre when no other band around could anyway.</p>
<p>Although I thoroughly enjoyed this album, I wonder just how much longer Radiohead should (or even could) keep producing albums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fake Plastic Tunes</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21236</link>
		<dc:creator>Fake Plastic Tunes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21236</guid>
		<description>Hard to call this the weakest album when it is still incomplete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard to call this the weakest album when it is still incomplete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Revolution Is On YouTube - Push Play - push.ca</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21269</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21269</guid>
		<description>Ahhh, but what would you cut? I think Hail is a pretty strong album and works very well as an album split over four sides. The only song I can imagine cutting is "I Will."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhh, but what would you cut? I think Hail is a pretty strong album and works very well as an album split over four sides. The only song I can imagine cutting is &#8220;I Will.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Falling Out Of Bed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 23:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christian H</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21278</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 06:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21278</guid>
		<description>I just wanted to say that this is an amazing blog. It's introducing me to new types of music and I didn't think so much about how people analyze songs either!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to say that this is an amazing blog. It&#8217;s introducing me to new types of music and I didn&#8217;t think so much about how people analyze songs either!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Perpetua</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21271</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 06:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21271</guid>
		<description>But "Go to Sleep" was a single!  And the final four songs are the very best!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But &#8220;Go to Sleep&#8221; was a single!  And the final four songs are the very best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob K</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21270</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21270</guid>
		<description>Oh, listen to it on vinyl?  Interesting!  I've never approached it from that perspective and I can see your point.

I think I'd cut some songs near the end that are just out of place enough that the record starts sounding like a long odds-and-sods comp: "I Will,""Punch Up", "Wolf at the Door." And I love those songs, the last two being personal favorites, but they could be B-sides (or in the case of "Punch Up", a nice fit on "In Rainbows").  After that I'd maybe delegate "Go To Sleep" to B-side status as well, to get it all down to a more focused and cohesive 42 minutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, listen to it on vinyl?  Interesting!  I&#8217;ve never approached it from that perspective and I can see your point.</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;d cut some songs near the end that are just out of place enough that the record starts sounding like a long odds-and-sods comp: &#8220;I Will,&#8221;"Punch Up&#8221;, &#8220;Wolf at the Door.&#8221; And I love those songs, the last two being personal favorites, but they could be B-sides (or in the case of &#8220;Punch Up&#8221;, a nice fit on &#8220;In Rainbows&#8221;).  After that I&#8217;d maybe delegate &#8220;Go To Sleep&#8221; to B-side status as well, to get it all down to a more focused and cohesive 42 minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Perpetua</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21269</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21269</guid>
		<description>Ahhh, but what would you cut? I think Hail is a pretty strong album and works very well as an album split over four sides. The only song I can imagine cutting is "I Will."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhh, but what would you cut? I think Hail is a pretty strong album and works very well as an album split over four sides. The only song I can imagine cutting is &#8220;I Will.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob K</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21268</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 14:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21268</guid>
		<description>For the most part I am in favor of albums that come in around 38-45 minutes.  

If Radiohead had cut some chaff from "Hail to the Thief" and got it down to under 40 minutes, it might be considered their best album (or at least on par with their best work).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the most part I am in favor of albums that come in around 38-45 minutes.  </p>
<p>If Radiohead had cut some chaff from &#8220;Hail to the Thief&#8221; and got it down to under 40 minutes, it might be considered their best album (or at least on par with their best work).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I wrote about Radiohead a while ago but was too busy to put it up, so here it is now. &#171; Attentiondeficitdisorderly by Sean T. Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21264</link>
		<dc:creator>I wrote about Radiohead a while ago but was too busy to put it up, so here it is now. &#171; Attentiondeficitdisorderly by Sean T. Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 02:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21264</guid>
		<description>[...] of Limbs, the other day. I don&#8217;t think I see much value in viewing it through the lens of &#8220;Radiohead&#8217;s weakest album&#8221; as does my friend Matthew Perpetua. I get what he&#8217;s saying about it being a relatively minor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Limbs, the other day. I don&#8217;t think I see much value in viewing it through the lens of &#8220;Radiohead&#8217;s weakest album&#8221; as does my friend Matthew Perpetua. I get what he&#8217;s saying about it being a relatively minor [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Perpetua</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21239</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 04:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21239</guid>
		<description>How is this album "incomplete?" Seriously, even if Radiohead puts out another new album next Friday, this is still an album in its own right! They have said and done nothing to the contrary. Why is it so hard for Radiohead fans to grasp the notion that many albums are under 40 minutes, and that many albums have 8 songs or fewer? I mean, are you trying to say that Led Zepellin IV isn't an album because it has 8 songs and came out under a year after Led Zeppelin III?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is this album &#8220;incomplete?&#8221; Seriously, even if Radiohead puts out another new album next Friday, this is still an album in its own right! They have said and done nothing to the contrary. Why is it so hard for Radiohead fans to grasp the notion that many albums are under 40 minutes, and that many albums have 8 songs or fewer? I mean, are you trying to say that Led Zepellin IV isn&#8217;t an album because it has 8 songs and came out under a year after Led Zeppelin III?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21238</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 03:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21238</guid>
		<description>My jaw dropped when I read that second line. I believe that the second half of TKOL is simply amazing, and the album is far superior to both Pablo Honey (although yes, Creep is amazing) and Hail to the Theif. 

This album has been reviewed (often negatively) by Radiohead's high standards, and although this is unavoidable TKOL needs to be considered both as a Radiohead album AND as a regular 2011 album. They shouldn't be criticised for failing to produce another album of Kid A's calibre when no other band around could anyway.

Although I thoroughly enjoyed this album, I wonder just how much longer Radiohead should (or even could) keep producing albums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My jaw dropped when I read that second line. I believe that the second half of TKOL is simply amazing, and the album is far superior to both Pablo Honey (although yes, Creep is amazing) and Hail to the Theif. </p>
<p>This album has been reviewed (often negatively) by Radiohead&#8217;s high standards, and although this is unavoidable TKOL needs to be considered both as a Radiohead album AND as a regular 2011 album. They shouldn&#8217;t be criticised for failing to produce another album of Kid A&#8217;s calibre when no other band around could anyway.</p>
<p>Although I thoroughly enjoyed this album, I wonder just how much longer Radiohead should (or even could) keep producing albums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fake Plastic Tunes</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21236</link>
		<dc:creator>Fake Plastic Tunes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21236</guid>
		<description>Hard to call this the weakest album when it is still incomplete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard to call this the weakest album when it is still incomplete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Revolution Is On YouTube - Push Play - push.ca</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21268</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 14:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21268</guid>
		<description>For the most part I am in favor of albums that come in around 38-45 minutes.  

If Radiohead had cut some chaff from "Hail to the Thief" and got it down to under 40 minutes, it might be considered their best album (or at least on par with their best work).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the most part I am in favor of albums that come in around 38-45 minutes.  </p>
<p>If Radiohead had cut some chaff from &#8220;Hail to the Thief&#8221; and got it down to under 40 minutes, it might be considered their best album (or at least on par with their best work).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Falling Out Of Bed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 23:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christian H</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21278</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 06:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21278</guid>
		<description>I just wanted to say that this is an amazing blog. It's introducing me to new types of music and I didn't think so much about how people analyze songs either!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to say that this is an amazing blog. It&#8217;s introducing me to new types of music and I didn&#8217;t think so much about how people analyze songs either!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Perpetua</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21271</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 06:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21271</guid>
		<description>But "Go to Sleep" was a single!  And the final four songs are the very best!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But &#8220;Go to Sleep&#8221; was a single!  And the final four songs are the very best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob K</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21270</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21270</guid>
		<description>Oh, listen to it on vinyl?  Interesting!  I've never approached it from that perspective and I can see your point.

I think I'd cut some songs near the end that are just out of place enough that the record starts sounding like a long odds-and-sods comp: "I Will,""Punch Up", "Wolf at the Door." And I love those songs, the last two being personal favorites, but they could be B-sides (or in the case of "Punch Up", a nice fit on "In Rainbows").  After that I'd maybe delegate "Go To Sleep" to B-side status as well, to get it all down to a more focused and cohesive 42 minutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, listen to it on vinyl?  Interesting!  I&#8217;ve never approached it from that perspective and I can see your point.</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;d cut some songs near the end that are just out of place enough that the record starts sounding like a long odds-and-sods comp: &#8220;I Will,&#8221;"Punch Up&#8221;, &#8220;Wolf at the Door.&#8221; And I love those songs, the last two being personal favorites, but they could be B-sides (or in the case of &#8220;Punch Up&#8221;, a nice fit on &#8220;In Rainbows&#8221;).  After that I&#8217;d maybe delegate &#8220;Go To Sleep&#8221; to B-side status as well, to get it all down to a more focused and cohesive 42 minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Perpetua</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21269</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21269</guid>
		<description>Ahhh, but what would you cut? I think Hail is a pretty strong album and works very well as an album split over four sides. The only song I can imagine cutting is "I Will."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhh, but what would you cut? I think Hail is a pretty strong album and works very well as an album split over four sides. The only song I can imagine cutting is &#8220;I Will.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob K</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21268</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 14:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21268</guid>
		<description>For the most part I am in favor of albums that come in around 38-45 minutes.  

If Radiohead had cut some chaff from "Hail to the Thief" and got it down to under 40 minutes, it might be considered their best album (or at least on par with their best work).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the most part I am in favor of albums that come in around 38-45 minutes.  </p>
<p>If Radiohead had cut some chaff from &#8220;Hail to the Thief&#8221; and got it down to under 40 minutes, it might be considered their best album (or at least on par with their best work).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I wrote about Radiohead a while ago but was too busy to put it up, so here it is now. &#171; Attentiondeficitdisorderly by Sean T. Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21264</link>
		<dc:creator>I wrote about Radiohead a while ago but was too busy to put it up, so here it is now. &#171; Attentiondeficitdisorderly by Sean T. Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 02:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21264</guid>
		<description>[...] of Limbs, the other day. I don&#8217;t think I see much value in viewing it through the lens of &#8220;Radiohead&#8217;s weakest album&#8221; as does my friend Matthew Perpetua. I get what he&#8217;s saying about it being a relatively minor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Limbs, the other day. I don&#8217;t think I see much value in viewing it through the lens of &#8220;Radiohead&#8217;s weakest album&#8221; as does my friend Matthew Perpetua. I get what he&#8217;s saying about it being a relatively minor [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Perpetua</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21239</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 04:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21239</guid>
		<description>How is this album "incomplete?" Seriously, even if Radiohead puts out another new album next Friday, this is still an album in its own right! They have said and done nothing to the contrary. Why is it so hard for Radiohead fans to grasp the notion that many albums are under 40 minutes, and that many albums have 8 songs or fewer? I mean, are you trying to say that Led Zepellin IV isn't an album because it has 8 songs and came out under a year after Led Zeppelin III?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is this album &#8220;incomplete?&#8221; Seriously, even if Radiohead puts out another new album next Friday, this is still an album in its own right! They have said and done nothing to the contrary. Why is it so hard for Radiohead fans to grasp the notion that many albums are under 40 minutes, and that many albums have 8 songs or fewer? I mean, are you trying to say that Led Zepellin IV isn&#8217;t an album because it has 8 songs and came out under a year after Led Zeppelin III?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21238</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 03:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21238</guid>
		<description>My jaw dropped when I read that second line. I believe that the second half of TKOL is simply amazing, and the album is far superior to both Pablo Honey (although yes, Creep is amazing) and Hail to the Theif. 

This album has been reviewed (often negatively) by Radiohead's high standards, and although this is unavoidable TKOL needs to be considered both as a Radiohead album AND as a regular 2011 album. They shouldn't be criticised for failing to produce another album of Kid A's calibre when no other band around could anyway.

Although I thoroughly enjoyed this album, I wonder just how much longer Radiohead should (or even could) keep producing albums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My jaw dropped when I read that second line. I believe that the second half of TKOL is simply amazing, and the album is far superior to both Pablo Honey (although yes, Creep is amazing) and Hail to the Theif. </p>
<p>This album has been reviewed (often negatively) by Radiohead&#8217;s high standards, and although this is unavoidable TKOL needs to be considered both as a Radiohead album AND as a regular 2011 album. They shouldn&#8217;t be criticised for failing to produce another album of Kid A&#8217;s calibre when no other band around could anyway.</p>
<p>Although I thoroughly enjoyed this album, I wonder just how much longer Radiohead should (or even could) keep producing albums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fake Plastic Tunes</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21236</link>
		<dc:creator>Fake Plastic Tunes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21236</guid>
		<description>Hard to call this the weakest album when it is still incomplete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard to call this the weakest album when it is still incomplete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Revolution Is On YouTube - Push Play - push.ca</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21264</link>
		<dc:creator>I wrote about Radiohead a while ago but was too busy to put it up, so here it is now. &#171; Attentiondeficitdisorderly by Sean T. Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 02:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21264</guid>
		<description>[...] of Limbs, the other day. I don&#8217;t think I see much value in viewing it through the lens of &#8220;Radiohead&#8217;s weakest album&#8221; as does my friend Matthew Perpetua. I get what he&#8217;s saying about it being a relatively minor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Limbs, the other day. I don&#8217;t think I see much value in viewing it through the lens of &#8220;Radiohead&#8217;s weakest album&#8221; as does my friend Matthew Perpetua. I get what he&#8217;s saying about it being a relatively minor [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Falling Out Of Bed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 23:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christian H</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21278</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 06:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21278</guid>
		<description>I just wanted to say that this is an amazing blog. It's introducing me to new types of music and I didn't think so much about how people analyze songs either!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to say that this is an amazing blog. It&#8217;s introducing me to new types of music and I didn&#8217;t think so much about how people analyze songs either!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Perpetua</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21271</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 06:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21271</guid>
		<description>But "Go to Sleep" was a single!  And the final four songs are the very best!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But &#8220;Go to Sleep&#8221; was a single!  And the final four songs are the very best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob K</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21270</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21270</guid>
		<description>Oh, listen to it on vinyl?  Interesting!  I've never approached it from that perspective and I can see your point.

I think I'd cut some songs near the end that are just out of place enough that the record starts sounding like a long odds-and-sods comp: "I Will,""Punch Up", "Wolf at the Door." And I love those songs, the last two being personal favorites, but they could be B-sides (or in the case of "Punch Up", a nice fit on "In Rainbows").  After that I'd maybe delegate "Go To Sleep" to B-side status as well, to get it all down to a more focused and cohesive 42 minutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, listen to it on vinyl?  Interesting!  I&#8217;ve never approached it from that perspective and I can see your point.</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;d cut some songs near the end that are just out of place enough that the record starts sounding like a long odds-and-sods comp: &#8220;I Will,&#8221;"Punch Up&#8221;, &#8220;Wolf at the Door.&#8221; And I love those songs, the last two being personal favorites, but they could be B-sides (or in the case of &#8220;Punch Up&#8221;, a nice fit on &#8220;In Rainbows&#8221;).  After that I&#8217;d maybe delegate &#8220;Go To Sleep&#8221; to B-side status as well, to get it all down to a more focused and cohesive 42 minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Perpetua</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21269</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21269</guid>
		<description>Ahhh, but what would you cut? I think Hail is a pretty strong album and works very well as an album split over four sides. The only song I can imagine cutting is "I Will."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhh, but what would you cut? I think Hail is a pretty strong album and works very well as an album split over four sides. The only song I can imagine cutting is &#8220;I Will.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob K</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21268</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 14:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21268</guid>
		<description>For the most part I am in favor of albums that come in around 38-45 minutes.  

If Radiohead had cut some chaff from "Hail to the Thief" and got it down to under 40 minutes, it might be considered their best album (or at least on par with their best work).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the most part I am in favor of albums that come in around 38-45 minutes.  </p>
<p>If Radiohead had cut some chaff from &#8220;Hail to the Thief&#8221; and got it down to under 40 minutes, it might be considered their best album (or at least on par with their best work).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I wrote about Radiohead a while ago but was too busy to put it up, so here it is now. &#171; Attentiondeficitdisorderly by Sean T. Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21264</link>
		<dc:creator>I wrote about Radiohead a while ago but was too busy to put it up, so here it is now. &#171; Attentiondeficitdisorderly by Sean T. Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 02:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21264</guid>
		<description>[...] of Limbs, the other day. I don&#8217;t think I see much value in viewing it through the lens of &#8220;Radiohead&#8217;s weakest album&#8221; as does my friend Matthew Perpetua. I get what he&#8217;s saying about it being a relatively minor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Limbs, the other day. I don&#8217;t think I see much value in viewing it through the lens of &#8220;Radiohead&#8217;s weakest album&#8221; as does my friend Matthew Perpetua. I get what he&#8217;s saying about it being a relatively minor [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Perpetua</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21239</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 04:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21239</guid>
		<description>How is this album "incomplete?" Seriously, even if Radiohead puts out another new album next Friday, this is still an album in its own right! They have said and done nothing to the contrary. Why is it so hard for Radiohead fans to grasp the notion that many albums are under 40 minutes, and that many albums have 8 songs or fewer? I mean, are you trying to say that Led Zepellin IV isn't an album because it has 8 songs and came out under a year after Led Zeppelin III?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is this album &#8220;incomplete?&#8221; Seriously, even if Radiohead puts out another new album next Friday, this is still an album in its own right! They have said and done nothing to the contrary. Why is it so hard for Radiohead fans to grasp the notion that many albums are under 40 minutes, and that many albums have 8 songs or fewer? I mean, are you trying to say that Led Zepellin IV isn&#8217;t an album because it has 8 songs and came out under a year after Led Zeppelin III?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21238</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 03:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21238</guid>
		<description>My jaw dropped when I read that second line. I believe that the second half of TKOL is simply amazing, and the album is far superior to both Pablo Honey (although yes, Creep is amazing) and Hail to the Theif. 

This album has been reviewed (often negatively) by Radiohead's high standards, and although this is unavoidable TKOL needs to be considered both as a Radiohead album AND as a regular 2011 album. They shouldn't be criticised for failing to produce another album of Kid A's calibre when no other band around could anyway.

Although I thoroughly enjoyed this album, I wonder just how much longer Radiohead should (or even could) keep producing albums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My jaw dropped when I read that second line. I believe that the second half of TKOL is simply amazing, and the album is far superior to both Pablo Honey (although yes, Creep is amazing) and Hail to the Theif. </p>
<p>This album has been reviewed (often negatively) by Radiohead&#8217;s high standards, and although this is unavoidable TKOL needs to be considered both as a Radiohead album AND as a regular 2011 album. They shouldn&#8217;t be criticised for failing to produce another album of Kid A&#8217;s calibre when no other band around could anyway.</p>
<p>Although I thoroughly enjoyed this album, I wonder just how much longer Radiohead should (or even could) keep producing albums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fake Plastic Tunes</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21236</link>
		<dc:creator>Fake Plastic Tunes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21236</guid>
		<description>Hard to call this the weakest album when it is still incomplete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard to call this the weakest album when it is still incomplete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Revolution Is On YouTube - Push Play - push.ca</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21239</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 04:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21239</guid>
		<description>How is this album "incomplete?" Seriously, even if Radiohead puts out another new album next Friday, this is still an album in its own right! They have said and done nothing to the contrary. Why is it so hard for Radiohead fans to grasp the notion that many albums are under 40 minutes, and that many albums have 8 songs or fewer? I mean, are you trying to say that Led Zepellin IV isn't an album because it has 8 songs and came out under a year after Led Zeppelin III?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is this album &#8220;incomplete?&#8221; Seriously, even if Radiohead puts out another new album next Friday, this is still an album in its own right! They have said and done nothing to the contrary. Why is it so hard for Radiohead fans to grasp the notion that many albums are under 40 minutes, and that many albums have 8 songs or fewer? I mean, are you trying to say that Led Zepellin IV isn&#8217;t an album because it has 8 songs and came out under a year after Led Zeppelin III?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Falling Out Of Bed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 23:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christian H</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21278</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 06:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21278</guid>
		<description>I just wanted to say that this is an amazing blog. It's introducing me to new types of music and I didn't think so much about how people analyze songs either!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to say that this is an amazing blog. It&#8217;s introducing me to new types of music and I didn&#8217;t think so much about how people analyze songs either!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Perpetua</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21271</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 06:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21271</guid>
		<description>But "Go to Sleep" was a single!  And the final four songs are the very best!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But &#8220;Go to Sleep&#8221; was a single!  And the final four songs are the very best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob K</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21270</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21270</guid>
		<description>Oh, listen to it on vinyl?  Interesting!  I've never approached it from that perspective and I can see your point.

I think I'd cut some songs near the end that are just out of place enough that the record starts sounding like a long odds-and-sods comp: "I Will,""Punch Up", "Wolf at the Door." And I love those songs, the last two being personal favorites, but they could be B-sides (or in the case of "Punch Up", a nice fit on "In Rainbows").  After that I'd maybe delegate "Go To Sleep" to B-side status as well, to get it all down to a more focused and cohesive 42 minutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, listen to it on vinyl?  Interesting!  I&#8217;ve never approached it from that perspective and I can see your point.</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;d cut some songs near the end that are just out of place enough that the record starts sounding like a long odds-and-sods comp: &#8220;I Will,&#8221;"Punch Up&#8221;, &#8220;Wolf at the Door.&#8221; And I love those songs, the last two being personal favorites, but they could be B-sides (or in the case of &#8220;Punch Up&#8221;, a nice fit on &#8220;In Rainbows&#8221;).  After that I&#8217;d maybe delegate &#8220;Go To Sleep&#8221; to B-side status as well, to get it all down to a more focused and cohesive 42 minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Perpetua</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21269</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21269</guid>
		<description>Ahhh, but what would you cut? I think Hail is a pretty strong album and works very well as an album split over four sides. The only song I can imagine cutting is "I Will."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhh, but what would you cut? I think Hail is a pretty strong album and works very well as an album split over four sides. The only song I can imagine cutting is &#8220;I Will.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob K</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21268</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 14:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21268</guid>
		<description>For the most part I am in favor of albums that come in around 38-45 minutes.  

If Radiohead had cut some chaff from "Hail to the Thief" and got it down to under 40 minutes, it might be considered their best album (or at least on par with their best work).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the most part I am in favor of albums that come in around 38-45 minutes.  </p>
<p>If Radiohead had cut some chaff from &#8220;Hail to the Thief&#8221; and got it down to under 40 minutes, it might be considered their best album (or at least on par with their best work).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I wrote about Radiohead a while ago but was too busy to put it up, so here it is now. &#171; Attentiondeficitdisorderly by Sean T. Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21264</link>
		<dc:creator>I wrote about Radiohead a while ago but was too busy to put it up, so here it is now. &#171; Attentiondeficitdisorderly by Sean T. Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 02:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21264</guid>
		<description>[...] of Limbs, the other day. I don&#8217;t think I see much value in viewing it through the lens of &#8220;Radiohead&#8217;s weakest album&#8221; as does my friend Matthew Perpetua. I get what he&#8217;s saying about it being a relatively minor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Limbs, the other day. I don&#8217;t think I see much value in viewing it through the lens of &#8220;Radiohead&#8217;s weakest album&#8221; as does my friend Matthew Perpetua. I get what he&#8217;s saying about it being a relatively minor [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Perpetua</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21239</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 04:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21239</guid>
		<description>How is this album "incomplete?" Seriously, even if Radiohead puts out another new album next Friday, this is still an album in its own right! They have said and done nothing to the contrary. Why is it so hard for Radiohead fans to grasp the notion that many albums are under 40 minutes, and that many albums have 8 songs or fewer? I mean, are you trying to say that Led Zepellin IV isn't an album because it has 8 songs and came out under a year after Led Zeppelin III?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is this album &#8220;incomplete?&#8221; Seriously, even if Radiohead puts out another new album next Friday, this is still an album in its own right! They have said and done nothing to the contrary. Why is it so hard for Radiohead fans to grasp the notion that many albums are under 40 minutes, and that many albums have 8 songs or fewer? I mean, are you trying to say that Led Zepellin IV isn&#8217;t an album because it has 8 songs and came out under a year after Led Zeppelin III?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21238</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 03:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21238</guid>
		<description>My jaw dropped when I read that second line. I believe that the second half of TKOL is simply amazing, and the album is far superior to both Pablo Honey (although yes, Creep is amazing) and Hail to the Theif. 

This album has been reviewed (often negatively) by Radiohead's high standards, and although this is unavoidable TKOL needs to be considered both as a Radiohead album AND as a regular 2011 album. They shouldn't be criticised for failing to produce another album of Kid A's calibre when no other band around could anyway.

Although I thoroughly enjoyed this album, I wonder just how much longer Radiohead should (or even could) keep producing albums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My jaw dropped when I read that second line. I believe that the second half of TKOL is simply amazing, and the album is far superior to both Pablo Honey (although yes, Creep is amazing) and Hail to the Theif. </p>
<p>This album has been reviewed (often negatively) by Radiohead&#8217;s high standards, and although this is unavoidable TKOL needs to be considered both as a Radiohead album AND as a regular 2011 album. They shouldn&#8217;t be criticised for failing to produce another album of Kid A&#8217;s calibre when no other band around could anyway.</p>
<p>Although I thoroughly enjoyed this album, I wonder just how much longer Radiohead should (or even could) keep producing albums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fake Plastic Tunes</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21236</link>
		<dc:creator>Fake Plastic Tunes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21236</guid>
		<description>Hard to call this the weakest album when it is still incomplete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard to call this the weakest album when it is still incomplete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Revolution Is On YouTube - Push Play - push.ca</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21238</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 03:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21238</guid>
		<description>My jaw dropped when I read that second line. I believe that the second half of TKOL is simply amazing, and the album is far superior to both Pablo Honey (although yes, Creep is amazing) and Hail to the Theif. 

This album has been reviewed (often negatively) by Radiohead's high standards, and although this is unavoidable TKOL needs to be considered both as a Radiohead album AND as a regular 2011 album. They shouldn't be criticised for failing to produce another album of Kid A's calibre when no other band around could anyway.

Although I thoroughly enjoyed this album, I wonder just how much longer Radiohead should (or even could) keep producing albums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My jaw dropped when I read that second line. I believe that the second half of TKOL is simply amazing, and the album is far superior to both Pablo Honey (although yes, Creep is amazing) and Hail to the Theif. </p>
<p>This album has been reviewed (often negatively) by Radiohead&#8217;s high standards, and although this is unavoidable TKOL needs to be considered both as a Radiohead album AND as a regular 2011 album. They shouldn&#8217;t be criticised for failing to produce another album of Kid A&#8217;s calibre when no other band around could anyway.</p>
<p>Although I thoroughly enjoyed this album, I wonder just how much longer Radiohead should (or even could) keep producing albums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Falling Out Of Bed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 23:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christian H</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21278</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 06:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21278</guid>
		<description>I just wanted to say that this is an amazing blog. It's introducing me to new types of music and I didn't think so much about how people analyze songs either!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to say that this is an amazing blog. It&#8217;s introducing me to new types of music and I didn&#8217;t think so much about how people analyze songs either!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Perpetua</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21271</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 06:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21271</guid>
		<description>But "Go to Sleep" was a single!  And the final four songs are the very best!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But &#8220;Go to Sleep&#8221; was a single!  And the final four songs are the very best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob K</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21270</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21270</guid>
		<description>Oh, listen to it on vinyl?  Interesting!  I've never approached it from that perspective and I can see your point.

I think I'd cut some songs near the end that are just out of place enough that the record starts sounding like a long odds-and-sods comp: "I Will,""Punch Up", "Wolf at the Door." And I love those songs, the last two being personal favorites, but they could be B-sides (or in the case of "Punch Up", a nice fit on "In Rainbows").  After that I'd maybe delegate "Go To Sleep" to B-side status as well, to get it all down to a more focused and cohesive 42 minutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, listen to it on vinyl?  Interesting!  I&#8217;ve never approached it from that perspective and I can see your point.</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;d cut some songs near the end that are just out of place enough that the record starts sounding like a long odds-and-sods comp: &#8220;I Will,&#8221;"Punch Up&#8221;, &#8220;Wolf at the Door.&#8221; And I love those songs, the last two being personal favorites, but they could be B-sides (or in the case of &#8220;Punch Up&#8221;, a nice fit on &#8220;In Rainbows&#8221;).  After that I&#8217;d maybe delegate &#8220;Go To Sleep&#8221; to B-side status as well, to get it all down to a more focused and cohesive 42 minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Perpetua</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21269</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21269</guid>
		<description>Ahhh, but what would you cut? I think Hail is a pretty strong album and works very well as an album split over four sides. The only song I can imagine cutting is "I Will."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhh, but what would you cut? I think Hail is a pretty strong album and works very well as an album split over four sides. The only song I can imagine cutting is &#8220;I Will.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob K</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21268</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 14:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21268</guid>
		<description>For the most part I am in favor of albums that come in around 38-45 minutes.  

If Radiohead had cut some chaff from "Hail to the Thief" and got it down to under 40 minutes, it might be considered their best album (or at least on par with their best work).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the most part I am in favor of albums that come in around 38-45 minutes.  </p>
<p>If Radiohead had cut some chaff from &#8220;Hail to the Thief&#8221; and got it down to under 40 minutes, it might be considered their best album (or at least on par with their best work).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I wrote about Radiohead a while ago but was too busy to put it up, so here it is now. &#171; Attentiondeficitdisorderly by Sean T. Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21264</link>
		<dc:creator>I wrote about Radiohead a while ago but was too busy to put it up, so here it is now. &#171; Attentiondeficitdisorderly by Sean T. Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 02:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21264</guid>
		<description>[...] of Limbs, the other day. I don&#8217;t think I see much value in viewing it through the lens of &#8220;Radiohead&#8217;s weakest album&#8221; as does my friend Matthew Perpetua. I get what he&#8217;s saying about it being a relatively minor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Limbs, the other day. I don&#8217;t think I see much value in viewing it through the lens of &#8220;Radiohead&#8217;s weakest album&#8221; as does my friend Matthew Perpetua. I get what he&#8217;s saying about it being a relatively minor [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Perpetua</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21239</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 04:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21239</guid>
		<description>How is this album "incomplete?" Seriously, even if Radiohead puts out another new album next Friday, this is still an album in its own right! They have said and done nothing to the contrary. Why is it so hard for Radiohead fans to grasp the notion that many albums are under 40 minutes, and that many albums have 8 songs or fewer? I mean, are you trying to say that Led Zepellin IV isn't an album because it has 8 songs and came out under a year after Led Zeppelin III?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is this album &#8220;incomplete?&#8221; Seriously, even if Radiohead puts out another new album next Friday, this is still an album in its own right! They have said and done nothing to the contrary. Why is it so hard for Radiohead fans to grasp the notion that many albums are under 40 minutes, and that many albums have 8 songs or fewer? I mean, are you trying to say that Led Zepellin IV isn&#8217;t an album because it has 8 songs and came out under a year after Led Zeppelin III?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21238</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 03:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21238</guid>
		<description>My jaw dropped when I read that second line. I believe that the second half of TKOL is simply amazing, and the album is far superior to both Pablo Honey (although yes, Creep is amazing) and Hail to the Theif. 

This album has been reviewed (often negatively) by Radiohead's high standards, and although this is unavoidable TKOL needs to be considered both as a Radiohead album AND as a regular 2011 album. They shouldn't be criticised for failing to produce another album of Kid A's calibre when no other band around could anyway.

Although I thoroughly enjoyed this album, I wonder just how much longer Radiohead should (or even could) keep producing albums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My jaw dropped when I read that second line. I believe that the second half of TKOL is simply amazing, and the album is far superior to both Pablo Honey (although yes, Creep is amazing) and Hail to the Theif. </p>
<p>This album has been reviewed (often negatively) by Radiohead&#8217;s high standards, and although this is unavoidable TKOL needs to be considered both as a Radiohead album AND as a regular 2011 album. They shouldn&#8217;t be criticised for failing to produce another album of Kid A&#8217;s calibre when no other band around could anyway.</p>
<p>Although I thoroughly enjoyed this album, I wonder just how much longer Radiohead should (or even could) keep producing albums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fake Plastic Tunes</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21236</link>
		<dc:creator>Fake Plastic Tunes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21236</guid>
		<description>Hard to call this the weakest album when it is still incomplete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard to call this the weakest album when it is still incomplete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Revolution Is On YouTube - Push Play - push.ca</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21236</link>
		<dc:creator>Fake Plastic Tunes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21236</guid>
		<description>Hard to call this the weakest album when it is still incomplete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard to call this the weakest album when it is still incomplete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Falling Out Of Bed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 23:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christian H</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21278</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 06:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21278</guid>
		<description>I just wanted to say that this is an amazing blog. It's introducing me to new types of music and I didn't think so much about how people analyze songs either!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to say that this is an amazing blog. It&#8217;s introducing me to new types of music and I didn&#8217;t think so much about how people analyze songs either!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Perpetua</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21271</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 06:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21271</guid>
		<description>But "Go to Sleep" was a single!  And the final four songs are the very best!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But &#8220;Go to Sleep&#8221; was a single!  And the final four songs are the very best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob K</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21270</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21270</guid>
		<description>Oh, listen to it on vinyl?  Interesting!  I've never approached it from that perspective and I can see your point.

I think I'd cut some songs near the end that are just out of place enough that the record starts sounding like a long odds-and-sods comp: "I Will,""Punch Up", "Wolf at the Door." And I love those songs, the last two being personal favorites, but they could be B-sides (or in the case of "Punch Up", a nice fit on "In Rainbows").  After that I'd maybe delegate "Go To Sleep" to B-side status as well, to get it all down to a more focused and cohesive 42 minutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, listen to it on vinyl?  Interesting!  I&#8217;ve never approached it from that perspective and I can see your point.</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;d cut some songs near the end that are just out of place enough that the record starts sounding like a long odds-and-sods comp: &#8220;I Will,&#8221;"Punch Up&#8221;, &#8220;Wolf at the Door.&#8221; And I love those songs, the last two being personal favorites, but they could be B-sides (or in the case of &#8220;Punch Up&#8221;, a nice fit on &#8220;In Rainbows&#8221;).  After that I&#8217;d maybe delegate &#8220;Go To Sleep&#8221; to B-side status as well, to get it all down to a more focused and cohesive 42 minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Perpetua</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21269</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21269</guid>
		<description>Ahhh, but what would you cut? I think Hail is a pretty strong album and works very well as an album split over four sides. The only song I can imagine cutting is "I Will."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhh, but what would you cut? I think Hail is a pretty strong album and works very well as an album split over four sides. The only song I can imagine cutting is &#8220;I Will.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob K</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21268</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 14:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21268</guid>
		<description>For the most part I am in favor of albums that come in around 38-45 minutes.  

If Radiohead had cut some chaff from "Hail to the Thief" and got it down to under 40 minutes, it might be considered their best album (or at least on par with their best work).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the most part I am in favor of albums that come in around 38-45 minutes.  </p>
<p>If Radiohead had cut some chaff from &#8220;Hail to the Thief&#8221; and got it down to under 40 minutes, it might be considered their best album (or at least on par with their best work).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I wrote about Radiohead a while ago but was too busy to put it up, so here it is now. &#171; Attentiondeficitdisorderly by Sean T. Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21264</link>
		<dc:creator>I wrote about Radiohead a while ago but was too busy to put it up, so here it is now. &#171; Attentiondeficitdisorderly by Sean T. Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 02:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21264</guid>
		<description>[...] of Limbs, the other day. I don&#8217;t think I see much value in viewing it through the lens of &#8220;Radiohead&#8217;s weakest album&#8221; as does my friend Matthew Perpetua. I get what he&#8217;s saying about it being a relatively minor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Limbs, the other day. I don&#8217;t think I see much value in viewing it through the lens of &#8220;Radiohead&#8217;s weakest album&#8221; as does my friend Matthew Perpetua. I get what he&#8217;s saying about it being a relatively minor [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Perpetua</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21239</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Perpetua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 04:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21239</guid>
		<description>How is this album "incomplete?" Seriously, even if Radiohead puts out another new album next Friday, this is still an album in its own right! They have said and done nothing to the contrary. Why is it so hard for Radiohead fans to grasp the notion that many albums are under 40 minutes, and that many albums have 8 songs or fewer? I mean, are you trying to say that Led Zepellin IV isn't an album because it has 8 songs and came out under a year after Led Zeppelin III?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is this album &#8220;incomplete?&#8221; Seriously, even if Radiohead puts out another new album next Friday, this is still an album in its own right! They have said and done nothing to the contrary. Why is it so hard for Radiohead fans to grasp the notion that many albums are under 40 minutes, and that many albums have 8 songs or fewer? I mean, are you trying to say that Led Zepellin IV isn&#8217;t an album because it has 8 songs and came out under a year after Led Zeppelin III?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21238</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 03:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21238</guid>
		<description>My jaw dropped when I read that second line. I believe that the second half of TKOL is simply amazing, and the album is far superior to both Pablo Honey (although yes, Creep is amazing) and Hail to the Theif. 

This album has been reviewed (often negatively) by Radiohead's high standards, and although this is unavoidable TKOL needs to be considered both as a Radiohead album AND as a regular 2011 album. They shouldn't be criticised for failing to produce another album of Kid A's calibre when no other band around could anyway.

Although I thoroughly enjoyed this album, I wonder just how much longer Radiohead should (or even could) keep producing albums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My jaw dropped when I read that second line. I believe that the second half of TKOL is simply amazing, and the album is far superior to both Pablo Honey (although yes, Creep is amazing) and Hail to the Theif. </p>
<p>This album has been reviewed (often negatively) by Radiohead&#8217;s high standards, and although this is unavoidable TKOL needs to be considered both as a Radiohead album AND as a regular 2011 album. They shouldn&#8217;t be criticised for failing to produce another album of Kid A&#8217;s calibre when no other band around could anyway.</p>
<p>Although I thoroughly enjoyed this album, I wonder just how much longer Radiohead should (or even could) keep producing albums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fake Plastic Tunes</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21236</link>
		<dc:creator>Fake Plastic Tunes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21236</guid>
		<description>Hard to call this the weakest album when it is still incomplete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard to call this the weakest album when it is still incomplete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Revolution Is On YouTube - Push Play - push.ca</title>
		<link>http://www.fluxblog.org/2011/02/falling-out-of-bed#comment-21224</link>
		<dc:creator>The Revolution Is On YouTube - Push Play - push.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 21:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluxblog.org/?p=3895#comment-21224</guid>
		<description>[...] band that has and will always do whatever they want, regardless what anyone thinks. I did read one blog that said it was their &#34;weakest album,&#34; so thank someone for saying [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] band that has and will always do whatever they want, regardless what anyone thinks. I did read one blog that said it was their &quot;weakest album,&quot; so thank someone for saying [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

